Research Article | Open Access
Volume 2025 - 4 | Article ID 292 | http://dx.doi.org/10.51521/IJFMPH.2025.42.123
Academic Editor: John Bose
Dr.
Sagam Dinesh Reddy¹*, Dr. Sateesh Babu Kaki², Dr. Sarath Chandra Nibhanpudi³
¹MD (Physician), DFM (Family
Medicine), DICMH/CCPMH (NIMHANS Bangalore), PGPN (Boston University USA), AFIH
(RLI Kanpur / DGFASLI Govt of India),
Director, LMR Hospital, G
Konduru, NTR District, Andhra Pradesh – 521229, India.
ORCID: [0000-0001-7659-9441]
Email: dineshsagam143@gmail.com
²Assistant Professor, Department
of Biochemistry, GSL Medical College and Hospital, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh,
India. ORCID: [0009-0000-2952-5538]
³Assistant Professor, Department
of Pharmacology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences (SVIMS),
Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. ORCID: [0009-0009-9671-5505]
Corresponding Author: Dr. Sagam Dinesh Reddy, LMR Hospital, G
Konduru, NTR District, Andhra Pradesh, India, 521229, ORCID:
[0000-0001-7659-9441].
Citation: Dr. Sagam Dinesh Reddy, Dr. Sateesh Babu
Kaki, Dr. Sarath Chandra Nibhanpudi (2025) Systematic Review and
Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals on Circadian
Clock Gene Expression. Int J Fam Med Pub Health, 4(2);1-4.
Copyrights: © 2025, S. Dinesh Reddy, This
is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and
source are credited.
Abstract:
Background: Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) such as bisphenol A
(BPA), PFOS, PCBs, DEHP, and dioxins are known to interfere with hormonal
systems. Emerging evidence suggests that EDCs can also disrupt circadian rhythm
by altering the expression of core clock genes like BMAL1, PER1, CRY1, and
CLOCK. However, no prior meta-analysis has comprehensively quantified this
impact across multiple biological models. Objective: To systematically
review and meta-analyze the effects of EDC exposure on circadian clock gene
expression across human, animal, and in vitro studies. Methods: This
review followed a PROSPERO-registered protocol (CRD420251068975). Databases
searched included PubMed, Scopus, GEO, and ToxNet from January 2000 to June
2025. Inclusion criteria encompassed in vivo, in vitro, or epidemiological
studies reporting gene expression data for BMAL1, PER1, CRY1, and CLOCK after
EDC exposure. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using standardized
mean differences (SMDs). Risk of bias was assessed using OHAT and the
Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: From 342 screened records, 19 studies
met inclusion criteria, and 10 were eligible for meta-analysis. EDC exposure
was associated with significant downregulation of circadian genes, particularly
BMAL1 and PER1. The pooled effect size was SMD = –0.48 (95% CI: –0.59 to –0.37;
p < 0.001), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 41%). Funnel plots
showed no substantial publication bias. Conclusion: This meta-analysis
demonstrates consistent and statistically significant suppression of core
circadian genes by chronic EDC exposure. These findings highlight the
importance of including chronodisruption markers in toxicological and
occupational health surveillance frameworks.
Keywords: Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals, Circadian Rhythm, Gene Expression, BMAL1, PER1, CRY1, CLOCK, Chronodisruption, Toxicogenomics.