Research Article | Open Access
Volume 2025 - 3 | Article ID 273 | http://dx.doi.org/10.51521/WJMRR.2025.3102
Academic Editor: John Bose
1Adarsh Benny, 2
Priya Kamat
1Biochemistry, Assistant professor, Hill
Side Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Bangalore-560082, saldoddi, India
2Assistant professor, Department of
Biochemistry, Dr. M.V. Shetty Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Vidyanagar,
PIN code: 575013, Mangalore, India
Corresponding Author: Priya Kamat, Assistant professor, Department of
Biochemistry, Dr. M.V. Shetty Institute of Allied Health Sciences, Vidyanagar,
PIN code: 575013, Mangalore, India.
Citation: Adarsh Benny, Priya
Kamat (2025) The Relationship Between Mnemonic Awareness and Academic
Performance Among Students. World J Multidiscip Res Rev, 3(1);1-7.
Copyright: © 2025, Adarsh Benny.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use,
distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and
source are credited.
Abstract
Background: There are numerous approaches to help students
increase their knowledge and comprehension of a subject. The purpose of this
study was to assess how well student-based mnemonic formation using
multiple-choice questions (MCQ) stimulated training and comprehension of
biochemistry concepts.
Methods: From a variety of medical universities, medical students were
willingly chosen. They were presented with mnemonics that had already been
validated using prior-oriented mnemonics. Students were asked feedback questions
about their use of mnemonics. Statistics: Results were presented as percentages
using descriptive statistics.
Result: In conclusion, while mnemonics serve as valuable
memory aids, their current use among medical students appears limited in depth
and pedagogical support. To cultivate deeper learning, medical education must
go beyond superficial memorization and adopt a more holistic approach—one that
teaches students not only how to remember, but how to understand, apply, and
critically engage with the knowledge they acquire.
Conclusion: The lack of deep learning testing in the mnemonics may indicate that the students did not acquire the higher levels of comprehension anticipated, but this is frequently a challenging conclusion to draw, especially since it is unrealistic to expect students to produce mnemonics that test higher order cognitive skills on their first attempt.
===========================
Highlights:
High Awareness, Low Formal Training: While 80% of students are familiar with mnemonics, only 10% reported being taught about them in their curriculum, indicating a major gap between awareness and formal instruction.
Acronyms Dominate Mnemonic Use: Among the
types of mnemonics used, acronyms were the most popular (70%), followed by
visual imagery (50%), showing a preference for simpler, easily recallable
formats.
Positive Perception, Inconsistent Use: Although 85% of students found mnemonics helpful and
80% would recommend them to peers, only 40% reported using them regularly,
suggesting underutilization.
Perceived Academic Benefits with Room for Depth: 70% of students observed improved memory retention, and 60% noted some academic improvement; however, 50% believed the study of mnemonics lacks depth, highlighting a need for more comprehensive integration.
Challenges Limit Effectiveness: Common
barriers included forgetting the mnemonics (40%), time required to create them
(30%), and difficulty in formulating them (20%), underscoring the need for
guided training and curriculum support.