CAR T-cell therapy is one of the most celebrated achievements in cancer treatment, having proven effective at curing several
hard-to-treat blood cancers, such as large B-cell lymphoma1 and
B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia.2 These successes
are not to be underplayed, but while CAR T-cell therapy has claimed the
spotlight, it has cast a shadow on a lesser-known sister technology, one that
is rooted in similar immunotherapy modification theory and could prove even
more effective at treating a wider range of cancers.
Lentiviral
vectors have developed alongside CAR T-cell therapy and they are now revealing
their true value as both an alternative therapy and a powerful, additional tool
in treating a wider range of cancers. This article looks at the evidence for
the use of lentiviral vectors as cancer treatments, dispelling the harmful and
inaccurate myths that persist around the platform and revealing their wider use
in vaccines and much more.
Lentiviral vectors are similar to CAR
T-cell therapy in several ways: the two platforms stem from the same technology
and both immunotherapies act to modify the immune system to instigate a
response. However, lentiviral vectors generate responses in a very different
way.
Lentiviral vectors are the only immunotherapies designed to
transduce dendritic cells, the notoriously hard to manipulate, non-dividing
cells that exclusively induce T-cell responses. Using DNA flap technology,
along with specific promoters that increase the transduction efficiency, access
can now be gained to these non-dividing cell nuclei. By genetically engineering
lentiviral vectors with cancer cell antigens and in turn, using these to
transduce dendritic cells, T-cells can be activated and proliferated to
recognise and destroy tumours. Importantly, a dendritic cell will continue to
display antigens throughout its life, resulting in a sustained T-cell response.
A key feature of lentiviral vector transduction and resulting T-cell activation
is the process that happens in vivo, utilising the body’s natural
immune response.
Several pre-clinical animal studies have already proven
the effectiveness of lentiviral vectors in eradicating solid tumours, including
prostate cancer in mice, with tumours expressing prostate-specific antigen
(PSA).3 HPV-induced tumour eradication has also been observed
in mice models, along with protection against tumor re-challenge.3
CAR T-cell therapy has proven to be
very effective in treating some blood cancers, such as certain lymphomas and
leukaemias. However, lentiviral vectors may one day be an alternative to CAR
T-cell therapy and a forerunner for the treatment of solid tumours, an area
where CAR T-cell therapy has no proven success.
With the recent promising results seen in pre-clinical trials,
lentiviral vectors have the potential to transform treatment for solid tumours,
providing wider application and increased potential versus CAR T-cell therapy.
The transduction of dendritic cells, with their role in activating cellular
immunity, provides strong and diverse treatment opportunity for a wide range of
indications. Lentiviral vectors have already demonstrated broader therapeutic
and prophylactic applications for wider cancer treatment, but also gene
therapy,3 vaccines for infectious diseases, such as COVID-194 and
the treatment of HIV, with safety and immunogenicity demonstrated in a Phase I
clinical trial.5
A key advantage of lentiviral vector therapy is the
activation of the body’s natural immune response. Vectors are introduced to the
body in vivo and the immune response is activated and
proliferated by the dendritic cells, using the body’s own immune system and
mechanisms. With this approach, multiple tumour antigens can be coded within
one vector, widening the range of cancers that can be treated through one
therapy and likely increasing T-cell efficacy.3 This in vivo proliferation
means that lentiviral vectors will be more scalable and more cost-effective
than CAR T-cell therapy.
Conversely, CAR T-cell therapy produces an artificial
response and require more protracted and intrusive preparation. T-cells must be
extracted from the patient, engineered ex vivo, proliferated and then
introduced back into the body through infusion. Creating this artificial immune
response requires advanced laboratories and skilled scientific knowledge and it
comes at a considerable cost. CAR T-cell therapy is not without its risks
either; cytokine storms are too common a side effect as the body reacts against
this simulated immune condition, causing serious, sometimes life-threatening,
consequences.6
Lentiviral vectors have had their share
of unfair press in recent years. A lack of understanding of the science behind
the platform and a good deal of overshadowing from CAR T-cell therapy have
prevented lentiviral vectors from receiving the attention and therefore the
funding and research that the field deserves. Ultimately, the brakes have been
applied to a technology that could change the future landscape of cancer
treatment.
First, an outdated and inaccurate view of lentiviral
vectors persists. Some viral vectors, such as retroviruses vectors, integrate
their genome into the host human genome and when vectors of this kind have been
used in treatments, they have occasionally been associated with causing cancer.7 The
lentiviruses are members of the retrovirus family; yet those lentiviruses vectors
which can be now be used for cancer treatment are non-integrative vectors,
meaning they cannot integrate into the human cell DNA and thus cannot cause
insertional oncogenesis that can lead to cancer.
Secondly,
lentiviral vectors are often criticised in relation to manufacturing
limitations. Although in the early days, it was difficult to produce lentiviral
vectors in volume, this is not the case now. Production capabilities have
advanced and many contract manufacturing organisations can make lentiviral
vectors at scale. In the case of cancer treatment, large volumes are not
required, but even large-scale production for prophylactics, such as lentiviral
vector vaccines, is now possible with the availability of more advanced
biopharmaceutical scale-up and scale-out techniques.
Finally, the perceived competition
with CAR T-cell therapy has caused lentiviral vectors to be passed over when it
comes to developing cancer treatments. Developing lentiviral vectors for use in
this way will build on the successes already seen in gene therapy and vaccine
development and help to further widen the scope for these versatile vectors.
Clearly, CAR T-cell therapy is
revolutionising the treatment of certain types of cancers, providing a strong
alternative to traditional and more generalised, chemical-based therapies.
While lentiviral vector research does not aim to negate or minimise the
incredible work in this space, the spotlight on CAR T-cell therapy has cast a
shadow on its lesser-known sibling: the lentiviral vector therapies that have
grown from the same core science.
The focus on one immunotherapy
platform has allowed misconceptions to persist and innovation to slow in regard
to the development of lentiviral vectors as potential cancer therapies.
However, a growing body of evidence and the work of a core group of dedicated
advocates is putting lentiviral vectors in a new light. Early trials have
demonstrated that lentiviral vectors are safe and effective potential
treatments for a wide range of solid tumour pathologies, as well as
prophylactics and treatments for an even wider range of genetic and infectious
diseases.
Professor Christian Brechot is the chair of the scientific advisory board for
TheraVectys. Christian is a prominent medical doctor and researcher and is
currently a Professor at the University of South Florida and President of the
Global Virus Network.